Saved datasets
Last updated
Download format
Usage rights
License from data provider
Please review the applicable license to make sure your contemplated use is permitted.
Topic
Provider
Free
Cost to access
Described as free to access or have a license that allows redistribution.
2 datasets found
  1. W

    Webis-Editorial-Quality-18

    • webis.de
    1340629
    Updated 2018
  2. Challenge or Empower: Revisiting Argumentation Quality in a News Editorial...

    • zenodo.org
    • commons.datacite.org
    zip
    Updated Aug 29, 2022
  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Roxanne El Baff; Henning Wachsmuth; Khalid Al-Khatib; Benno Stein (2018). Webis-Editorial-Quality-18 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340629

Webis-Editorial-Quality-18

Explore at:
4 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
1340629Available download formats
Dataset updated
2018
Dataset provided by
University of Groningen
Leibniz Universität Hannover
The Web Technology & Information Systems Network
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
Authors
Roxanne El Baff; Henning Wachsmuth; Khalid Al-Khatib; Benno Stein
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

The Webis-Editorials-18 corpus comprises 1000 news editorials that are annotated in accordance with a new notion for argumentation quality. The notion regards whether an editorial brings readers of opposing beliefs closer together or rather increases the gap between them. In particular, we label each editorial in the corpus as challenging, reinforcing, or no-effect. To account for the political ideology of the target readers, each editorial is labelled by three liberals and three conservatives.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu